What the Web Isn't

You're probably thinking about your new website inhad a huge Flash introduction, followed by two screens
terms of what it will be and do. It's equally important toof text which add up to maybe three paragraphs. This
consider it in terms of what it won't be and shouldn'tis the web's answer to a 30-second TV spot.
be.Think about what you can't do in a 30-second TV
Imagine delivering sales presentations as epic poems,spot- these sites have the same problem.
and telling your spouse about your love for her with a-You can't sell effectively to multiple audiences.
PowerPoint presentation. Obviously, it won't work well.-You can't provide detailed specifications.
The web's exactly like any other medium- ideally suited-You can't build a community or resource that people
for certain tasks, clunky for others, and downright sillywill come back to. How often do you watch old
for some. If you go into the web development processcommercials for their informative value?
with a clear understanding of what websites aren'tSome people might hope to use websites primarily to
good replacements for, you'll make choices whichbuild brand awareness, or as a teaser, by which to
produce a better website."force" your potential customers into contacting you
Websites are NOT desktop applications.for more information. Both of those assumptions are
If you're looking at developing a website as anaive.
replacement for software that once ran on yourFirst, it's only practical to build brand awareness alone
internal network or PCs, you may come in dreamingwhen you've got a huge audience. This is the mindset
that your new website will be essentially the samebehind Super Bowl ads- if you're lucky, enough people
environment, only living in a Firefox or IE window. Thiswill remember you're the belching hamster company
mindset, carried too far, can result in significant addedand see what you're about. An ad on the Super Bowl
complexity, and potentially limit the benefits you'rereaches 60% of the TV audience at the time. Even
getting by moving to the web. It often means ignoringthe most popular websites- Google and Yahoo- reach
the things which make the Web a usable place.30% or less of the web-user population on a given
First, users have far more control over the flow of aday, according to traffic-analysis firm Alexa. For a
website session than if you work with a desktopmore typical example, the site rated as the 37,249th
application. Although you can provide navigation, themost popular site on May 8th, 2007 only reached
odds are fairly strong that users will instead click theabout 11 out of every million web users that day.
"back" and "forward" buttons to make their waySecond, users resent being steered into making
through a multiple stage process. Some users tend tocontact with you. Bandwidth and storage have never
open new browser windows at certain steps in thebeen cheaper, so there's very little excuse not to
procedure. This becomes dangerous when you useprovide detailed information on your website. If
frames or AJAX technology to provide a site whereeverything is a "call us for more details" message,
parts of the site stay in place as you change others. Ifmany users will bounce. They'll either be concerned
you click "Back" on the browser instead of the site'sthat the company isn't professional or capable enough
own "Go Back" control, you may find yourself returnedto adequately fill out its own website, or suspicious that
to the beginning of a multi-stage task, or worse yet,they'll have to sit through solicitations once they make
stranded with no easy route back to the start orcontact with you.
where you were before.-Websites are not TV itself either.
The news isn't all bad there: you can often design toPeople have been trying to turn the web into TV at
exploit this situation. A user who can open a newleast since Internet Explorer 4 and its "Channel Bar". It's
browser window is less likely to become strandeda terrible metaphor. The Web offers so much more
because they can't get the information needed tothan TV.
proceed, and some tasks obviously make sense to-Television tends to offer a selection of content that's
present as "click the back button and try again".a mile wide but six inches deep, while the Internet is
Second, websites should be "self-contained" whenboth wide and deep. If I want more information on a
possible. Even if you can't have the databases and thesubject once a show has ended, the show itself rarely
code on the same machine, you can at least strive toprovides me with options. A well-planned website will
move the whole assembly onto remote hosting. Manyprovide both its own resources and links to quality
desktop applications, especially for a business's internalsites, allowing me to go as far as I want in the topic.
use, rely on a server for the office. Every PC in the-There are no "Channels" on the Internet. If I turn on a
office draws information from that. If you follow theTV station, particularly a cable one, they're going to
same model for your website, you end up still havingstick fairly close to their target subject matter. It's not
to take care of the office server, AND constantlylike they're suddenly going to make pastry on the
monitor its connectivity to the website.Cartoon Network. This is perfect for a passive
Finally, performance characteristics are going to bemedium- the program changes every 30 minutes for
different on the Web. Desktop applications areyou, but doesn't wander far from home.
frequently processor- or disc-limited, but graphics areThe Internet is more active. You choose both when to
essentially free. In comparison, web servers generallyleave one site and where you're going next. Therefore,
have adequate processor and disc resources, whichthe click of a link corresponds to BOTH the click of a
are constrained by fairly limited transfer performanceremote (switching to an entirely new line of content)
to the user. You might find you get betterand a change of show (switching to new content on
responsiveness by devoting more time to processingthe same theme) If you start organizing your site
data, if it can avoid the transfer of unnecessary largecontent into "channels", it tends to encourage to
images or intermediate tables.restrictions on navigation, trying to ensure that the user
-Websites are NOT PDF files. You all know PDF files-doesn't jump into a different "channel" too easily.
those little "land mines" of the web, which unexpectedlyA "channel" mindset may also result in dividing content
spawn a slow-to-load plugin and a 5Mb download.in ways that don't match up with user's expectations,
Their saving grace is that they generally look the samejust to fit into the existing set of channels, or an
on every computer you view them on. If a 1040 has toimposing proliferation of channels.
look a certain way, fine, use a PDF. If the document isA good example of this is the otherwise excellent
really destined for printing, then it's okay to forceCraigslist. They organized their classified ads into types
specific font sizes and page layouts that look goodof merchandise. These are classic channels- once you
when printed. There are, however, just as manyget in one, the navigation doesn't provide an obvious
situations- such as product specifications and dataway to jump into another. As a result, if you're looking
sheets- where the target is the screen- and sitefor an item which doesn't fit clearly into one of the
owners seem incapable of converting thesecategories, it's common to make several wrong
documents to true Web documents.guesses before finding the "right" category.
Replacing a bloated PDF with a comparable set ofFurthermore, once you find the "right" category, you'll
HTML and images often results in faster loading,probably miss any ads which were placed in the
improved browser compatibility and stability (with no"wrong" category.
external plugin required, browser crashes and hangsIf content has to be divided, there are some interesting
are much less common), and less clumsy navigationapproaches which can help to lessen these problems:
(PDFs tend to throw off the "back" button's behaviour)-Wider categories reduce the ambiguity about where
Even those site owners who avoid using PDFs directlythe desired content will be found.
often want to turn their web site into the functional-A site could present a category and still have links to
equivalent of a PDF file- they'll attempt to force theits conceptual "neighbours".
use of certain fonts, colours, and in some cases evenAlternatively, the default view could include the
browsers in an attempt to control the presentation ofneighbouring categories to ensure overlapping content
the page. While a reasonable amount of corporateis made available.
style is entirely acceptable, and can improve your-Heirarchical categories (like many online shops) avoid
image online, you can't hold a lot of hope for everyonethe risk of a menu with 500 categories.
seeing your site exactly the same. Eventually you will-Tags instead of fixed categories allow users to
have a user on a mobile phone, or a person with fontsarrange the content in ways that make sense to them.
enlarged to accomodate weak eyes, and your visionThe key to successful web development is to
will collapse. In that situation, the best approach is torecognize and cooperate with the foibles and
plan to let it collapse gracefully- ensure the navigationstrengths of the medium. If you choose to design by
and content can still be read even under adversemetaphor, ensure that you're not becoming caught up
conditions.in the parts of the metaphor which won't work on the
-Websites are NOT TV commercials.web.
I'm sure you've went to more than one website which