| Guide to the new MySpace 2.0 Layouts | | | | There are a number of sites that have shifted from |
| The social network experience has evolved. | | | | the 1.0 design to 2.0 layouts. When MySpace |
| MySpace has recently switched it's "old" MySpace | | | | launched, founder Tom Anderson posted an overview |
| 1.0 layout style to a newly formatted, modern, | | | | of the new layouts and also highlighted content sites |
| MySpace 2.0 layouts style. Users were first given | | | | that got on board with them early. He specifically |
| the option between the two, but any new users to | | | | noted and their custom designed MySpace 2.0 |
| MySpace are actually required to use the 2.0 layout | | | | Layouts. pYzam was able to instantly convert |
| style at this point. This switch has impacted the | | | | thousands of designs, as well as have new custom |
| content development industry significantly as 1.0 layouts | | | | designs made to cater to the 2.0 crowd. |
| are formatted completely different than 2.0 and are | | | | Tom's recommendation is eye opening, as MySpace |
| not congruent. | | | | realizes (it seems) that there are many more things to |
| The new MySpace 2.0 layouts feature several | | | | be working on than the layout market, and that some |
| significant improvements. Users are able to define | | | | solid partners in this area provide a better overall |
| their preferred width, choose from a number of | | | | customization experience for the end user, even into |
| pre-designed styles and layouts, and there is a greater | | | | the MySpace 2.0 layouts era. There is a level of |
| focus on the more important aspects of a layout. | | | | simplicity within the content sites as well. For example |
| Despite their attempts, MySpace still has an | | | | on pYzam you simply find the code you want and |
| extremely limited selection of MySpace 2.0 layout | | | | follow a few simple instructions and you're profile is |
| content, and so users are once again left to fend for | | | | customized. The new design is much more modern |
| themselves when it comes to custom CSS styling, | | | | and appropriate, and thankfully it can be easily |
| backgrounds, and overall layout design. | | | | customized. |